Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

I honestly don’t find Wikipedia that biased as far as my experience is concerned. And there’s a mechanism to flag potentially biased content. The one true putrid channel of misinformation is Rational Wiki. THAT is truly disonest and ideological.

I’m loving the dad jokes and loving the truth bombs. Thanks for eloquently speaking the truth always, @StefanMolyneux

great assessment

WikiLies vs WikiLeaks

Come on Stephan, Wikipedia is much better that many, many other sources when it comes to truth.

I actually think Wikipedia is pretty good for the most part. I've gotten decent information about the knowledge problem from there but doing further research is ultimately better. I wouldn't use it as a source, but it makes it easier to find information through citations.

Woaaah, this is deep

Agree

Has Wikileaks ever done hacking/expose on Russia or Putin? If not, why not? Are their computers impervious to penetration? Do they have no secrets? Or could it be that Wikileaks is just anti-American? Or maybe Russia is their benefactor? Are you all being played?

It is not truth if it is a stolen piece of information made public so others can gain from it. The truth is found in the backstory, not in the story itself. It is not for a theif to decide.