The IQ debate seems to attract people who are baffled by the concept yet feel compelled to critique the subject with utter conviction that they make any sense at all.
Ah, the “fuzzy boundaries” fallacy trundles along, right on schedule. “You can’t EXACTLY define ‘tall,’ so there is no difference between a 7 foot man and a 5 foot man.”https://twitter.com/bewilderedOH/status/1115426108386754560 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Post modernism at its best
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I guess my input in this: I’d rather view individuals rather than a collective. It’s similar to the aggregate wage gap myth. Drill down: there is no systematic wage gap. Judge individuals on their own merits. Of course that means stop govt social engineering
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This sort of myopic statement is akin to theorizing that Great Danes and Chihuahuas have only subjective differences
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Stefan Always qualifies his findings as " generalizations"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
At first blush ‘bewildered’ (I mean, c’mon) seems to vehemently disagree with you, but, wait what’s this.... So crafty these lefties.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes the difference is only to be found via an optical illusion created by white male nationalist scientists across the world. ;-)
-
Hi there
@Reflectioneer! Define your own male identity and express it! Schick is for You! Be the man you are!#TheManIAm
pic.twitter.com/skYn1iouFd
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We can't agree therefore it's not real. Madness
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Definitions belong to the definers, not the defined...
“The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.” –Socrates.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
...or take maybe something like body fat percentage, or obesity. There are a lot of very definitely real characteristics which are also a bit tricky to easily quantify or measure. The fact that IQ is not something you have an ironclad measure doesn't make it less real.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
Feet, inches, meters, and centimeters are all considered objective measurements. Using both mean and median for the values above, one can make a reasonable definition of tall. IQ is not an objective measurement, like inches or meters. Social science != natural science.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.