It was a new tax bill (per Justice Roberts’ revision) that originated in the Senate rather than the House. That alone made it unconstitutional.
It will be pretty rough for some people if Obamacare gets struck down. That’s kind of why unconstitutional laws shouldn’t get passed in the first place. It’s rough for kids of Ponzi scheme criminals that they don’t get to keep the proceeds of a crime too...
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
-
-
Oh you are thrilled millions will lose insurance because you and some activists judges made this a political choice, how about you come here to the US and live under our disaster you stuck up racist evil criminal.
-
The activist judge in this case was John Roberts, when he decided the fee was a tax and ruled the law constitutional anyway. It was never constitutional.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
It should have been called ObamaCAID. It was mostly just an expansion of Medicaid, with huge up front subsidies by the feds that phased out. A gimmick.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This chart shows all we need to know about who won when we "passed it to see what's in it" and who will lose if it gets struck down.pic.twitter.com/WjLFNMcGzW
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It will be a hardship for some but a blessing for most.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It was kind of rough for me when they passed it, so........
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are married "children" still on parent's insurance. Adult children with children of their own still on parent's insurance. All declining insurance provided by the employer because the law says that mom and dad can keep them on their insurance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
actually, the government get's to keep ALLL OF IT, seizure of property is reserved only for the peasants
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well stated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No one talks about all the damage that was done changing to O care.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don’t spend my bank bailout tax dollars on healthcare for the needy!
-
The banks shouldn’t have been bailed out either.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.