Might I ask what philosopher you’re getting these arguments from, Stefan? This viewpoint is actually pretty fascinating and I’d like to read more into it just as an academic exercise.
Violence is expensive and risky without the State. You’re mistaking humans in captivity for human nature. Don’t think you understand animals just because you take notes at a zoo.https://twitter.com/BobHenryRob/status/1109688270944784384 …
-
-
-
Your very
@StefanMolyneux wrote one of the best takes on this topic. And it's free: http://cdn.media.freedomainradio.com/feed/books/PA/Practical_Anarchy_by_Stefan_Molyneux_PDF.pdf … -
Thanks for letting me know!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is one of the many fallacies of Anarcho-Capitalism. War is only expensive and risky if the other side is evenly matched or superior. Also, there's nothing stopping a company from forming a state in Ancapistan.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
A social human is a person in captivity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
There are still places where people eat each other.......
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If this were true, then there would be less gang activity in areas where state control is weak. Yet we see the exact opposite. Anarcho-capitalism is a utopian fantasy that ends up with something akin to the Mexican drug cartels in control.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Progressive governments understand that it's easier quelling resistance by an unarmed populace, than it is quelling rebellion from an armed society... dcc
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.