Because the lenders were told that their loans would be protected from simple bankruptcy. If students can simply decide not to pay it back, who will lend them money? How will higher interest rates affect new students?
-
-
-
They won't get loans and colleges would either have to lower costs and prices or close.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The banks always have to be payed. With student debt theres no collateral so they can't allow bankruptcy
-
Right. No one would make that loan. Kids would just come out of school, declare bankruptcy then they are good to go. Might as well have "free" college.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I do not think they are permitted to do that. At least not when I had a student loan.
-
That's the point
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This would be so unfair to those of us that chose an affordable college b/c we were financially responsible. If students knew that they could go to the most expensive school & have their debt forgiven through bankruptcy, no one would choose instate tuition.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Just get the government out of the loan industry. The banks then base loans on earning potential of the major. Gov. money corrupts everything it touches. Bonus, the "Studies" majors will likely near disappear.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Bankruptcy is not the answer nor is student loans. Unfortunately I do not have the answer but bankruptcy ruins credit and student loans gives colleges the ability to charge more. Supply and demand should reign with paid tuition for those that are high achievers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Impoverished students are desperate and easy prey for the likes of AOC and Bernie. Yang has been pushing the idea too. Too many people get on their high horse about student debt wagging fingers at the students. Unless Trump gets a handle on this we'll have a Socialist in the WH
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Master level, right there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Both ideas make sense. Then again we should just let banks decide how much they want to lend out, no need for govt regulators deciding how much is too much. I'm sure once the first person with no income defaults and declares bankruptcy the banks will institute their own limits.
-
The problem is the central banks are "printing" money out of thin air so there is always plenty of money to lend.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because if we limit the amount of money you can borrow to fund college the price increases colleges pass onto the students will be reduced. Leftists institution having to compete in the market of students, what a concept!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How ever will they learn that if you borrow something, you must pay it back? That means delayed gratification on lifestyle choices. Also, a signicture is a promise.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.