Oh dear it’s a shame you never read anything intelligent that might interfere with your certainty. “A systematic review of all the available evidence on peer review concluded that `the practice of peer review is based on faith in its effects, rather than on facts'.” More below.https://twitter.com/Belletheboi/status/1105656686419693568 …
-
-
OMGoodness someone is writing about this!!!! There may be hope for the human race after all. Without the ability to replicate there is no scientific results and by the way psychology is a soft science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's because they're using psychology probably sourced from animals husbandry and applying it to people, who have different cultural values which strongly dictate instinctual response, things animals don't have.
just a uneducated guess.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It isn't a replication problem, it is a logical fallacy problem. Manipulating qualitative information into quantitative data using OLS &/or MANOVA to understand subjective observations is false on its pretense. The same case is true for the study of climate or weather.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.