Oh dear it’s a shame you never read anything intelligent that might interfere with your certainty. “A systematic review of all the available evidence on peer review concluded that `the practice of peer review is based on faith in its effects, rather than on facts'.” More below.https://twitter.com/Belletheboi/status/1105656686419693568 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The problem extends far beyond the field of Psychology. This article details the phenomenon whereby studies appearing to show strong results can't even be replicated by original primary investigators. Even for what's accepted as well-established effects.https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/12/13/the-truth-wears-off …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's almost like "researchers" are rewarded more for the quantity and tone of their publications than the quality and accuracy. Almost.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Holy shit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They might've been working with the wrong Av. IQ numbers all along How frustrating Scientists usually run into such difficulties, especially in Psychology, when they apply the wrong IQ numbers based on race only to realize it does not tally with reality. What a waste of effort!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.