Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

Peer Pressure Review & Revision

The "Peer Reviewed" label lost it's credibility the a moment a peer reviewed journal published a paper on "Rape Culture in Dog Parks," and other papers with complete portions of Mein Kampf included in them. Anything claimed as peer reviewed is basically garbage at this point.

Peer review is in danger of the corruption of a conspiracy of delusion. Love me- I'll love you. Rock the boat and we'll gang up on you. Far better we all win- right or wrong. The civil service works in the same way- it's more profitable for all to hide disloyalty or incompetence

Peer review is largely indistinguishable from peer pressure.

You can tell in this thread who was beat up a lot in grade school

i Am VErY sMARt

It's a popularity contest. Nothing more. And nothing less.

I agree. I published a book on my recent discovery about Harmonics, let the free market give my my "reviews" on Amazon.

That is right on so many levels.

That is not an argument

If someone is going to claim, that “anthropologists believe something,” asking for links to their research seems reasonable. I guess not. The research should be copious if they all agree.

Needing an article to be peer reviewed to be worthy of consideration falls under the appeal to authority fallacy.

I wholeheartedly agree with you on that!

PREACH

Peer review depends on peers; the Peer Market crashed in the 1990s.