Letting social media companies censor at will versus placing them under government control is a false dichotomy. If they censor people based on politics, they are publishers not platforms, and thus are legally responsible for what shows up in your feed - like a magazine. (Cont)
-
-
But did you stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
*wrong opinions. TRUTH:https://medium.com/@teamwarren/heres-how-we-can-break-up-big-tech-9ad9e0da324c …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"I'm not a lawyer", says an aging bald guy with no discernible career
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How could we possibly forget?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You should factor corporate personhood into this equation.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's REASONABLE
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Founders would point out that the Frisco Soviet was created by a DARPA' initiative. Any corporate entity using government funds, which they arguably do by using the Federally subsidized Internet, must not violate the Constitution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.