Letting social media companies censor at will versus placing them under government control is a false dichotomy. If they censor people based on politics, they are publishers not platforms, and thus are legally responsible for what shows up in your feed - like a magazine. (Cont)
-
-
All Jack needs to do is make a contract for his customers to agree to follow the US constitution and US criminal code. Then they can report each other for violating the law all day long. Jack just has to pass it on to the police and courts to deal with.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Got to love the http://4chan.org model. It's like the uncensored Internet of the mid '90s.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He never really was an anarchist. He was just looking for a fringe group 2 b the leader of. All he really wants is to be the star of a show.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trump needs to move on this issue, I would argue that it is more important than the wall at this point.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Yep. Money talks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Devemos nós, todos os conservadores no mundo denunciar estas práticas de controle político nas redes sociais e exigir providências dos governos.
#ImpartialityNowThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not if the share holders agree with the moderators. We're dealing with woke Capitalism. It isn't about the money anymore, it's about controlling the narrative.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.