Let's split atoms. By far the best option.
We either burn prehistoric plants, dead dinosaurs or live trees. Or split atoms. Without energy, hundreds of millions die. Do you want to help the environment? Cut immigration and government spending.
-
-
-
For now. We should be pouring money into research into fusing them.
-
No, we should do both. Fission works, and it works very well and it can work a lot better with better technology. Fusion would be great, it's worth studying, it's worth pursuing. However we shouldn't put all our eggs in that basket.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Even if we imagine nuclear has no problems whatsoever it’s still massively dependent on government subsidies to even exist. They’re too expensive for energy corporations to bother building them
-
Not True. Contracts are being signed by Rosatom the world over to build Nuclear Plants in places like Egypt, Turkey, and India. Places that don't have massive subsidies to give. U.S. regulation on nuclear should be less stringent and advanced Gen 4 reactors are needed.
-
Yes far less regulation. On equipment which produces contamination and radiation. Regulations are written because of lessons learned. I know. I worked on on both S6G and S8G power plants.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
-
-
( or..) Or use renewable energy sources. Good. Yes. Gladly.
-
Look up how much of total Energy comes from renewables. Hint: single digit %. Replacing fossil and biomass for solar and wind will make current debt load look like pocket change. Today global debt is 320% of GDP.
-
Would that debt make human life at Earth unsustainable?
-
Why not go nuclear for 1/100 the price and 1/100,000 the sq milage and have the best of both worlds? Nuclear generates about 1000x the power of wind and solar except it does so at night with no wind, in the winter, rain etc. There is no sustainable future without nuclear energy.
-
Nuclear is good and we should have More of it. A failing nuclear plant is less harmful than a functioning coal plant
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There is enough energy in splitting atoms to power the planet for 10,000 years. And that is just what we have available to us now without mining another gram of Uranium or Thorium.
#GreenNuclearDealThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If not abiogenesis, how do you explain replenishing oil wells?
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Like Taco Bell, I find this hard to swallow. Aren't oil wells are miles apart? And you would think it would take decades for millions of gallons to drip through rock. Plus there's just way to much oil to get from plankton and dinosaur meat. I think it comes from the earths core.
-
indeed it does. the cult of scientist has brainwashed people into malthus' long refuted theories
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Solar is the future
-
The future has dark nights. And winters...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.