Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

Yep. Average IQ in the low 80s. Which would mean that almost 25% of their populations would fall into the "retarded" category (<70). These numbers seem totally correct and should be accepted at face value and should be used as one size fits all explanations to everything.

this is what racism does to your brains-it was an Indian merchent who brought vasco from melinde to India. Roman historians since pliny the elder complained that India was draining gold from empire via sea trade. vasco and columbus did not know enough navigation.

vast trading network existed between India,africa and china. ships routinely sailed from western Indian coast to eastern africa. Indians knew navigation better than Europeans till 1700's.

If Shaka had ships and guns, I reckon Europe would be speaking Zulu now.

I was debating this with my brother in law who is lol, Vietnamese and Chinese. He is so brainwashed by moral relativism and leftist bullshit. Sadly he couldn't explain why some cultures couldn't master the wheel even after it had been around for centuries.

Haha this is a deadly comeback. So precise and accurate. You have mastered the art of the argument.

Cultures don't have IQ's and IQ's don't stay the same in any group over time. Indians in the US have higher IQ's than white Americans and outperform in jobs and savings.

Yes, people with more money and access will be able to emigrate. But it doesn't change the fact that IQ fluctuates. European Jews had lower IQ's at the turn of 20th century and now higher than average. Indians invented 0 when Europeans were still running naked through the forest.

I don't disagree with you. You and I both agree IQ changes over time it seems. He talks about Indians as if its a fixed immutable gene pool. Genes are in constant exchange and how we identify people changes too. He is utterly incoherent on this subject.