The Libertarian Party is "libertarian" in the same way that the Republican Party is "conservative."
I remember when real libertarians knew that you can either have a welfare state OR open borders – you cannot have both. Modern immigration is a giant government program which coercively funds the importation of pro-socialist voters - libertarians used to oppose that immorality.https://twitter.com/LPNational/status/1096509154515140609 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or people prioritize the liberty and dignity of other human beings over the dismantling of the welfare state.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
-
-
“It’s not the people who want to move who are the problem. It’s the people who have the guns that are the problem.” -
@StefanMolyneux, “Immigration and Empathy,” January 24, 2007. https://www.fdrpodcasts.com/#/619/immigration-and-empathy …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep. Today's libertarians don't treat Open Borders as the final cherry on top, rather, the first place of agreement with the Left.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
if you dont want open borders ...gonna have to wall up the Canadian border too..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Libertarians may not like immigration because it brings in people with non-libertarian opinions, but libertarianism demands open borders nonetheless. It's a self-defeating ideology.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
free market also relies on no regulation of supply and demand does it sound nice with 50 cent a week wages and mass homelessness from overcrowding. futherdown the line warlords and gang warfare to steal supplies
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
They failed to put qualifying adjectives in front of the word 'people', so the sentiment is meaningless as it implies ALL people. How about 'violent people'? That ok? How about 'unemployable people'? That ok? How about 'self-supporting people'? Now THAT might be ok.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure you can have both. If your goal is to make a people pay for their own displacement there’s no better way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Yup they don’t speak for me that’s for sure... ugh
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've never heard a single libertarian say you can have both. Even Gary Johnson made the key issue of his Senate campaign that social security and Medicare are bankrupting the next generation. Dems and Repubs refuse the issue altogether.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Purity principles will not save them from demographics
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.