Yeah real solid record of “respecting blacks” Stefpic.twitter.com/XAV9CHjKZd
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
I respect blacks, so I give them moral agency in history, just as I give whites moral agency. Blacks in Africa caught and sold slaves. It’s racist to pretend they had no agency.https://twitter.com/Dbo5666/status/1095418249859289096 …
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Great fans you got
@StefanMolyneuxpic.twitter.com/QhRzEAAHLoThis media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I believe that when people think of slavery they have an image of white men running through the jungle with nets, like a scene from Planet if the Apes. Africans have been killing each over possessions or women for centuries. They still do.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And the French supported the American Revolution because they too were against Monarchies.
Give me a break.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There would be no supply without the demand.
-
And before Europeans showed up, the slaves went many other places. Other African tribes, the Islamic world, etc. When Europeans stopped buying, they used their navy's to crush the trade anywhere they could. Black slaves are still used and sold in Africa and the Middle East.
-
WHEN THEY STOPPED BUYING...Hmmmm
-
Hmmm indeed...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not only did blacks traffik slaves, it was a major part of the economy. The only thing that stopped it? Those 'evil' European imperialists. :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For there to be a trade, there must be buyers and sellers. To say that the sellers somehow outweigh the buyers in wrongdoing simply ignorance. Especially since the buyers continued the trade in their colonies, using everything from religion to pure belittlement to maintain it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think everyone actuallys knows that fact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The whole concept of "whites vs blacks," or "whites vs Indians" is modern. They were more concerned with tribal affiliation or nationality than race as a whole. British had indigenous allies against the French, and vice versa.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If we decide a segment of the population is not held as accountable as others, this in effect is determining that such people do not have the capacity to be responsible for their action. We treat children in this manner and it's racist to think of Blacks as not fully developed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you for your different point of view
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Slavery was written into the US Constitution - the 3/5's rule, and 11 states committed treason against the US in the 19th century in order to preserve it.pic.twitter.com/KYPlPnDoBz
-
The 3/5 compromise was the only way to pass the Constitution in the first place. We wouldn’t have a nation otherwise. Yes it’s deplorable, but the alternative would’ve been even worse.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Worse than having no nation at all? Then slavery would likely still exist in the Southern states, which wouldn’t even be called “states” since the Union would never have been formed. Northern pressures ended slavery eventually. The 3/5 comp was unfortunate but necessary.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.