Nice try at historical white washing.
Grain (even seed crop) was forcefully taken away by Brits and stored in godowns and transported to Brit all these with armed escorts. While the pple starved. Price of Indian wheat in UK was cheaper than animal fodder in India. @kofrax
Just trying to put another historical lie to rest... Did Churchill Cause the Bengal Famine? – The Churchill Project – Hillsdale Collegehttps://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/did-churchill-cause-the-bengal-famine/ …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
While Hillsdale is right on many subjects, this defense of Churchill is not 100%. Churchill said "good" thing about Indian soldiers - not it's people. That too years after the war. He wasn't even willing to give same rights as were given to other "white" colonies (Can, Aus-NZ)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t care why Uk, Churchill dark shadow and Elizabeth II are representing the most dangerous threat on me, but they do. And this feeling does not come from any call from my part. It cames uninvited and unresolved.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Churchill's Bengal famine was no one-off. It was a continuation of British policy prevalent 1757. A succession of induced famines which repeatedly caused millions of deaths as witnessed during British rule has no precedent in Indian history.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I think it is obvious that man never needed any leadership to grasp the power of doing evil for the greater good. Am sorry for your lack of hope, this is your characteristic. This is your megalomaniac entanglement.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Churchill was the greatest British traitor ever! He sold the UK and Europe to the very globalists that are now DESTROYING it! That's the real TRUTH.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
There are huge amounts of historical lies to grasp and why should appearing the king’s foul should lead your personnal choices towards famous ambivalence rather than personal ? Again, as a philosopher, you remind me strongly of BHL, the rich philosopher billionaire.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.