I believe that to be false.https://www.ft.com/content/7ce47bd0-545f-11e8-b3ee-41e0209208ec …
-
-
-
It sure is. Although their strategy is not to solve the problem by mass immigration and open borders but through robotic automation. They are hoping some short term young immigrants will hep solve the problem with a "take this $100 and f**k off" approach.
#itisoktobeanationalist -
Yes, that is actually good, though. I can assure that method makes Japan more stable than any country.
-
Having lived and worked there for 3 years, from my experience, it is a very cohesive country. Also political dialogue was fortunately very dull & boring and not as infuriatingly exhausting as it is in West. (I'm right they are wrong & stupid kind of arguments)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Gdp/capita doesn't mean much when it's increase is due to population decline
-
It kinda does as GDP per capita is what determines quality of life, not total GDP.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Why is that? Because they don't have many disenfranchised immigrants to play the identity politics power game. You have to hand it to the Left, they are very good at playing on peoples emotions. Also, for work Visa's, you need a University Degree... "Degreeists"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I lived in Japan for many years and loved every minute. The emphasis was on us westerners to assimilate and embrace Japanese culture. Kids 5-7 years old safely walk to school or navigate the train systems. Individual responsibility is emphasized. Japan is great.






-
They really emphasize 'responsibility and respect,' so people are well disciplined and they flourish.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I lived in Osaka for a year. Crime is low. None of my female colleagues felt nervous about walking home alone.
-
That's bc their men would rather play vidya and jack off to cartoons
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And they've relatively fallen by the wayside when it comes to total gdp
-
1980-1990 boom.... last 30 years stagnation
-
They didn't stagnate, they just returned to long-term growth trendlines after an unsustainable bubble in the 80s and early 90s.
-
What causes you to believe they’re on a long-term growth trend line?
-
I'm looking at economic growth going back decades, to the 1950s and 1960s. Plot the pre-bubble trendline from 1950 to 1985 forwards and you end up exactly where Japan is now. The 80s bubble drove it way, way above trend, and the "stagnation" brought it back.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Its pronounced ' laycist ' in japan
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.