Logically, it’s hard to say you are “pro-choice” when the practical result of killing a baby is the destruction of an entire lifetime of choices. It’s like saying you are “pro-property” when you are a thief.
-
Nope, because in your example the thief doesn't destroy the property. The thief takes it. Bad analogy.
-
-
LOL, but a thief can put it back or sell it or whatever. As ever you're waist-deep in semantics.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
- 9 more replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.