Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

I'm pro-choice. When a child turns 18, he or she should choose whether or not to be aborted.

It's anti-consequence.

In both cases it's "pro-selfishness".

Someone should start calling them life deniers. I'm pro-choice by the way, but there should be limits and abortion is not something to celebrate, or be happy about.

This is the modern world of pretentious and inaccurate labels. Anti war, as though others want war, pro life, as though others oppose life, Unite against Fascism, by fascistic illiberal ‘liberals’

There's no reason for a pro-choice person to take a "pro-choice" stance if they've successfully proven the pro-lifer wrong. To identify as "pro-choice" is to admit you cannot deny the pro-life position and to attempt to distract people from the real issue.

https://twitter.com/thetrumplady/status/1090711209366548480?s=21 …

Indeed! Pro-choice for me at the cost of everyone else's choice is what they mean.

They are "pro-intellectual" but like to censor wrong think. Sounds about right!

Stef, you so smart.

https://youtu.be/QcLOqGwnYno 

I understand. . . as soon as a property goes into escrow, the seller loses all of their rights to the property. . .

It would be more akin to saying you were pro-property as a construction company. If you build or tear-down something, there is usually a valid reason for that purpose. It doesn't change or diminish anything that anyone else chooses to build, including that same company.