Sir, if possible, could you direct me to the data on the topic of IQ. As a Med student im very much intrigued.
-
-
-
It's so easy to find relevant studies and books written on the subject. Look them up.
-
Would you kindly point me to some?
-
Checkout Stefan’s Website or his YouTube channel for more information and discussion on IQ https://www.fdrpodcasts.com
-
Thank you very much, mate
-
Read Innate: how the wiring of our brains shapes who we are and read Intelligence: all that matters. Then read the army and other IQ statistics
@StefanMolyneux relies on. His arguments are very well founded in the science as it currently stands.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I disagree with you about God. I am Catholic. I certainly respect your views in the matter, though.
-
In fact, I intentionally watch your videos on religion, because I respect your mind and you come to a different conclusion about God than I do. It helps me grow and understand and evolve my own position better in seeking truth.
-
In fact, you are the first person to properly convince me that morality can exist outside of religious beliefs, via your universal preferable behaviour arguments.
@jordanbpeterson's arguments also played a role in me realising my errors there.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You're being petty Stefan. It's a common phrase. I disagree with his views. It's not the best word. I agree with your ideas. Better?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Easy: You have a conflicting view. Duh.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
"That tree is green." "I disagree with your view." Open. . . your. . . eyes. . and view the tree.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can view the same data and hear the same arguments and come to a different conclusion. I feel like disagreeing with someone's view on a given subject is pretty basic stuff..? Unless, of course, you want to be painfully pedantic and distinguish between "view" and "conclusion."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is totally valid to disagree with someone's views. Views on anything are rooted in one's morality, that is developed by numerous factors. I'm not a postmodernist, but morality to some extent is subjective.
-
Logic would dictate otherwise. While we may never know the correct answer to a question, moral or otherwise, there is one. That answer may even be that you asked the wrong question. Disagreeing is fine for sake of civility. Still there is an absolute truth out in the ether.
-
I disagree with him on religion. I am Roman Catholic. It is also why I make sure to take in his arguments about religion, so I can grow and always seek truth.
-
Arguing and listening (equally important skills) enrich us. I'm just saying relativism is logically flawed at its base. Unless one can find a way to say rule 2 of relativism doesn't violate rule 1, it remains false. Still, we listen to each other because we love.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.