Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

I'm not disagreeing! (I am against sex before marriage for anyone) I just have always been genuinely interested in the research on the numbers with men because I haven't been able to find them. It mostly is about women.

That would be interesting. My guess is that it really do have a similar effect, but it is less pronounced. Women are much more sensible to hormonal and neurochemical changes. Many chaotic unbalances from random sexual experiences affects the more emotional driven women.

With that I leave a friendly reminder: There's no such thing as 'casual sex'

There is this idea that men are not naturally monogamous and that women are, so maybe that's where the lack of research comes from? I don't know. It bothers me a lot because I think that God requires both sexes to honor our bodies and marriage.

While I see where you are coming from, I don't believe that is the sole or predominant explanation. From an evolutionary perspective, once humans start to settle, there was an incentive to pair up and care for/protect YOUR children, not others.

Evolutionary pressures saw this as positive and selected those who practiced monogamous families because they could survive winters more easily. After years upon years, humans adopted pretty much a k reproductive strategy, laying our r genes dormant

Now that we have a false sense of security and infinite resources, those "winter selection pressures" vanish and r behaviours start to manifest again