In reading the "science" of the 14th century I have to acknowledge the evolution of science. Newtonian physics is a good example.
The responses are fun; I do apologize for the incomplete thought. When someone presents scientific data, you can’t just rebut them by saying the science has “evolved.” You need to provide counter evidence.https://twitter.com/andizeisler/status/1085985775420723200 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well I know for a fact literally every African I have gone to school with has been a math genius straight A student how does IQ science explain that?
-
Or does IQ not measure technical intellect but more so the ability to interpret complex philosophy
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
That moment you find out you're debating a liberal.....pic.twitter.com/0NlpVSJiP6
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Happily, beyond an indelicate twitter reply, you're not saddled with a low IQ. The roots of political correctness in mao's china are alive and well here now. Inconvenient facts that are correct are made politically incorrect. Either way, our IQ is on average higher than average.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.