Your credibility and expertise as an arguer has bearing on the strength of your argument. That's Aristotle if you ever feel like cracking the spine on a book.
Anyone who would believe what I say because I have a high IQ is a low IQ person – evaluate the arguments, not the individualhttps://twitter.com/unabanned/status/1082700148860432384 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well that's good because I don't believe anything that you say.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IQ is not a decent measure of real intelligence, wouldn't a system designed to measure intelligence need to have a universal definition of "intelligence" as a baseline?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's why I'm saying you should take a test on camera from a third party, that way what you say is irrelevant.
-
I'll get money to pay a 3rd party to test you from an accredited institution, you just do it on camera in front of them while they grade it. Bonus: You need to write what you think your IQ is put it in a sealed envelope while they're there, and then have your guess revealed after
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
at least 100
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A part of most arguments is to evaluate the legitimacy of the source though. Not doing so can lead to beliefs in ridiculous ideas just because they seemed stronger than the alternative argument.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I agree with Stefan and I have an IQ of 135, measured multiple times by everyone from the US Navy to paper tests to online tests. He's pretty smart, but his arguments are what you should judge him on.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's a good one
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well said Stef
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This why smart people never believed the "tobacco industry" Phd scientists when they kept saying that smoking is not bad for you, even if they had a high IQ.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i thought you were an empiricist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Low IQ + Having Government as God + Zombified + Same power as sane person + No morals, nor principles + equals DANGER NOT ONLY TO SOCIETY BUT TO CIVILIZATIONpic.twitter.com/HQh4a0y7B7
-
So Stefan has nothing to fear by taking such a test correct?
-
He know that he has High IQ ...don't you know that live evidence speaks louder than words. What is your point? He is speaking from that POV. If he were a dumbass he would not be arguing IQ he would be doing stupid pranks
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.