Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

It doesn't matter what number (97% or otherwise) is quoted in the media or in political arguments or propaganda. The point is that the overwhelming majority of relavant scientific papers published in peer reviewed journals concur with many aspects of ACC.

Yes, but we all know what "precision" means in mainstream journalism nowadays. Don't confuse the science with the media.

Even if 97% was an accurate figure, one could restate it as "97% of an industry wants job security." Face it: without the promise of danger, or the ability to control that danger, the vast majority of the climate change industry would cease to exist. That's a very human bias.

As Einstein said, "If I were wrong, then one would have been enough!"