Take this seriously Stefan! We already lost the ice caps!
So you think that water is classified as a pollutant?https://twitter.com/hilaryagro/status/1082057826069925888 …
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Third, I’m being sarcastic.
-
I suppose that would be fourth lol
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You're really doubling down on this eh Stephen
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Just admit you got dunked on.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
too much of anything cant be good. oxygen, water, politicians
-
Oh, but too much of a good thing is absolute heaven!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If the water violate the NAP then yes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Damn he doesnt get it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
You replying to this means I've just had to read the original tweet that led to the series of replies. And now I know it exists.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
That's ironic.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Stefan: CO2 is plant food, so it's not rational to classify it as a pollutant. Hilary: People need H2O, yet 3,500 people die from drowning each year. Me:pic.twitter.com/se6GE1cO9T
-
Is this really something that is confusing you?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hot water is litterally classified as a pollutant (thermal pollution). Dumping clean water may not be considered a pollutant, but if it can be added to an environment with bad reaults, it may. The word "pollutant" is largely contextual and is not describing the actual substance.
-
"Polluting" with thermodynamics when no phase shift happens is quite useless in the light of Entropy??
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.