You claimed that the existence of greenhouses counters the science that massive amounts of carbon dioxide emissions are a leading cause of climate change. Do you not understand the stretch in logic that takes?
Where did you go, you came on all kinds of strong at the beginning, calling me an idiot, but then when I asked you a simple question, you ghosted.https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1082097787578155009 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd imagine a clever boffin or two has put a plant in a 100% CO2 environment to observe the effect. And aren't plants and oxygen just another chicken-egg chronological conundrum? One had to come first.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not to worry... Wikipedia just removed IQ information.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Seems to me like more CO2 would lead to an abundance of plant life.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.