Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

Or, the opposite

the big question isn't being addressed Stefan. So the probablistic relation is skewed. The big question is: Does early life training in a process to learn by parents improve adolescent IQ.

I am always talking about IQ to high IQ people (over 120). They all get it. I bring it up all of the time. I have not had any problem. I work in IT so lots and lots of high IQ people there. The low IQ folks ignore me because they don't know what I am talking about.

And the next big question is: Does personal survival security, i.e., being fed, loved, nurtured, and taught language and other skills including math and counting at an early age by parents, while being properly fed, also increase children's future learning abilities.

Once you address these two questions, then you can see that the first idea is less genetic than sociological. Bad environments create less developed cognitive abilities, children under survival stress have less time for deeper spacial thought.

People push back on the truth. That makes it more important to speak it.

Can I stand together?

We just have to watch the brown shirts with their leftist sharia

So you’re saying we all hang?