Stefan MolyneuxVerified account

CO2 isn’t classified as a pollutant. It is a necessary atmospheric component for a whole host of systems for our planet to sustain life. But too much can be a problem, and that’s generally what experts mean when they talk about it.

I mean I think that was your logic, which is wrong, so no, water should not be redefined as a pollutant.

If it helped to change dangerous behavior, sure. I'm not sure why you're having trouble with the idea that changing the composition of air could be considered pollution, since you claim to be of the high IQ race.

What pushed you to spend more time on twitter lately? I'm curious.

Let’s step out of the binary model of pollutant/non-pollutant because it’s not a helpful way to understand this. Think about salt. You need some sodium to have normal body chemistry (eg NaK pumps) but too much causes you to have high blood pressure and too little causes seizures.

Flood control

Water vapor is a greenhouse gas.. You clearly haven't done the most basic of research into climate change

It was your own logic in fact which is why it was so hilariously wrong

Water vapor is a green house gas. It is present in much greater quantities than co2 as well.

Oxygen is great for life. But if you increase its level by a surprisingly small amount it will kill you. If you drink enough water it will kill you too, but in the right amount it’s life saving/enabling. It’s all a matter of dose. I thought you were an empiricist?