The Article is bad enough in it's bias and falsehood commonly found on the left. But the comment section is simply frightning when one considers the (expected) IQ of the average reader of the NYT. Excellent insight, on how, many liberals tick.
God I such contempt for this weaselling post-modern passive aggressive goo-language. His “views” do not “align with mine.“ We are both looking at the same data and reaching the same objective conclusions. Not everything is subjective. Those who built our world knew that.https://twitter.com/JF_INT_News/status/1081733346407927809 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t think he meant it that way.
-
I didn't, it was a genuine question. I am a long-time viewer of his YouTube channel.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It would be more precise, and less infantile for him to have said -"I draw different conclusions from the same data, because (reasons)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hey NYT, there's incontrovertible evidence of a black-white difference in IQ. Everything Stefan has written about this is correct. The attached image from The Bell Curve shows the mean IQ difference across multiple studies is around one standard deviation = 15 IQ points.pic.twitter.com/6WoOrwedNT
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
I'm baffled as to how many people take Molyneux as an expert on anything related to IQ. Apparently he's had some experts people on his show, so his fans somehow take that as a transitive quality and Molyneux is now an expert on the subject.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
He certainly parrots a lot of the same points he's heard, but he has no deep knowledge of the subject.
End of conversation
-
-
-
I openly laugh point and mock while present at one of those events
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Salty
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All machines, being that Machines, is just extension of an assertion of someone else’s will, that were built prior. Nature, for its own sake, will inevitably and indefinitely undermine such machines, for the faculty of absolute and pure freedom.
-
Liberty, I believe, is the freedom from coercion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Watson's particular comments were emminently worthy of condemnation because they were free of any consideration of different and OVERLAPPING IQ distributions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
@StefanMolyneux I apologize as I have misspoke. Your above post referring to yourself & Watson reaching the same objective conclusion was my intended meaning. Using post-modern passive aggressive language wasn't a method I aimed for. I'll in future be more precise in terminology - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
tbh Watson isn't simply looking at data. He's drawing moral conclusions from them abt not bothering to educate or send aid to Africans cos he considers it pointless. That is an opinon, not a fact.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.