Eugenics. I am not on board with this Humanistic philosophy.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Science itself is now a threat to globailist forces. If you want to control a population you will take over science so people lose the ability to use reason. In the past it was easier when the population was illiterate.
End of conversation
-
-
-
IQ is genetic and very important. but i believe there is a more important quality ,'emotion' which helps most on making decisions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not an argument
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The article references three scientific figures who refute Watson’s central claims. Dr. Francis Collins, David Reich, and Robert Plomin. Will you address their arguments, or still charge forward believing you hold the one and only “Truth”.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
That's exactly the problem. Opponents of the ethnicity/IQ correlation dishonestly pretend like there isn't a massive threat hanging over one side of the discussion and then act as if silence is agreement.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The truth about the world is much deeper than "racial IQ differences".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Strange how no one is responding to this. Have we found the third rail?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Harvard population geneticist, David Reich view;https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/23/opinion/sunday/genetics-race.html …
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 7 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.