![[Zug] 🐸](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/651949274859630592/LMbyoN_y_normal.png)
Acc. to research, low IQ types are drawn to “right wing ideologies” bc “they lack a cognitive ability to grasp complexities of our world.”
Do you agree ? @StefanMolyneux
If so:
Could your kindness & compassion be the reason why you oversimplify debates around IQ & race?
Here is one consequence of leftists not letting us talk about race and IQ. Robert McNamara allowed for the drafting and deployment of low IQ soldiers, which contributed significantly to the US losing in Vietnam. Stifled debates can lose battles. See also: IMMIGRATION.
-
-
-
Actually left wingers are drawn to a very emotional simplification of the complex issues. Center right people are much more reasoned in their positions
-
Moderate here. Can confirm. My political identity is devoid of emotions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
As an honorably discharged US veteran this grinds me to the core. Those men conscripted into that army did all that was humanly possible to fight that war. It was the supposed "high IQ" leadership who let those men down and allowed them to die by the thousands!
-
Any veteran should be insulted. Especially by someone who has never served a day in his life.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What's low IQ is thinking it was soldiers who lost the war
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
happy new year
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This most be among the stupidest things you've said so far. Congratulations on saving the best for literally the end. Happy New Year!
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You're wrong on
#Vietnam, US Army never lost a major battle including the Tet Offensive, attrited major communist units even as they were outnumbered, but withdrew based on allied noncohesiveness. Political will lost the war.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Surely IQ was the cause of us losing at 'Nam IQ-ists: "IQ explains everything!!" Lacking construct and biological validity (it can't have biological validity because the main aspect of test-taking is thinking which is irreducible to the physical).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which empirical historian or empirical political scientist believes that? How much higher IQ did the Vietnamese soldiers have on average?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your obsession and conflation with IQ and intelligence is neat. We lost in Vietnam for a lot of reasons, but I'm not sure many people believe it was because of the quality of our soldiers. Maybe I'm wrong. Keep reaching buddy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Stefan, it was the wrong strategy developed by the top leadership that failed in Vietnam. “Fog of War” documentary exposed the flawed “search and destroy” missions. Also,we propped up an illegitimate puppet regime...while Ho Chi Minh won the hearts and minds
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The US lost in Vietnam because it was an unjust and illegal war. America never intended to "Win" in the first place. You need to read "War is a Racket" by Brigader General Smedley Butler. Wars are not fought to be won in the first place necessarilly. $$$$ is the ultimate goal.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I think Vatican Jesuits were behind the whole fiasco in the end anyway.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"McNamara's Morons" was the name given to these poor very low IQ lads, sent out to be, literally, cannon fodder. Trouble was, they simply could not grasp any rules, any instructions or what was what. Consequently they shot the wrong people, like officers, and things went v wrong!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.