"Physically weaker"- granted. That one's obvious. "Slightly less smart, and often disabled by childbirth"- do you have statistics for that?
I hate to break it to you, but women are much less economically productive than men, because women are on average physically weaker, slightly less smart, and often disabled by childbirth. Female employment is a massive govt program. Tons of exceptions, but that is the reality.https://twitter.com/AncapMayor/status/1077791123333099520 …
-
-
-
Graph below. I guess both you and I are proof that women are physically disabled by childbirth sometimes
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Dude!!!!... Not cool...By definition as a "scientist" you should know that an exception to the rule by definition invalidates the rule. Men and women complement each other in a way that makes society function. Without either civilisation would cease to exist!!
-
Complimenting each other doesn't mean they have to do the same things. One could argue the typical housewife role would compliment the husband working for household income role, results in better child upbringing while all financial needs are met. Being equal yet not the same.
-
I agree with this...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hundreds of people are going to read this tweet and mentally delete the phrases "on average" and "Tons of exceptions" when they react to it.
-
The "average" part is pretty much wrong though. Not big enough to be relevant. Average IQ essentially the same. The differences in wage-IQ for men & women would be demonstrated in the different bell curves. There are more genius/slow men. The geniuses can earn exponentially more
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's incorrect Stefan. There is no statistically significant difference in the intelligence of men & women. YES: there is greater variation w/ more men at the bottom AND more men at the top. But both hover around 100. And "disabled by childbirth?" Seriously? You're killing me.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
"Slightly less smart" . Not true. Very silly comment. Men and women compliment each other and fill in each other gaps.
-
They also complement each other.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The flaws is in your argument are a) physical strength has little impact on economic productivity in post-industrial societies b) smartness of women has been held back by a lack of access to resources c) not every women is held back by childbirth but this is your most valid point
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
-
-
Anyone with an office job knows this, can’t explain it, then subscribes to feminist narrative to help explain it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe all this is a ploy to curb the number of children people have
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm a childless woman and saw the truth of your statement in Corporate America for 35 years. Ask a woman with kids to stay late or work weekends and it's, "But muh CHIIIIIILD!" Then they got pissed because I got the raise and promotion.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Why does it always have to be about ''economical productivity'' ?
-
Because it drives wages which are at the epicenter of the feminist debate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.