You literally retweeted the Church of Satan recently, saying: “This was from 1967, in the very early days of Satanism and is certainly worth watching.”https://twitter.com/W1219Bri/status/1075263243017285632 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Also not an argument. Snarkument maybe.
End of conversation
-
-
-
That's an ad hominem attack usually if you focus on who is delivering the argument instead of the argument itself it means you don't have a counterargument
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like daycare AND Pallas Athena
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dr. Phil
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If I had to do it all again I would force myself to find say 10 clever and kind locals and share schooling/daycare with them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Stefan, you are arguing in a code! Should you be more obvious in your research into Satanism and the conversation is: “I like daycare, I also like a atheistic philosophy based on individualism named after a being that is meant as a metaphor for Rebellion against tyranny.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But Stefan, you looked up that yourself. She never said anything about Satan in her tweet. For being a self-proclaimed philospher and saviour of the west you sure are quite stupid.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
What are you even arguing?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But...don't judge a book by its cover! Especially when it is a diet book promoted by obese Satanist daycare advocates...or something? Not sure where I was going with that. Carry on.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.