It’s been easier to convince people to hand over half their income, their children to war, and their freedoms in perpetuity, than to engage them in seriously considering how roads might function in the absence of taxation.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Sigh no one will pay a road company without a contractual guarantee of impartial service.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
With the U.K. phone lines you pay a line rental to open reach, the company who maintains them. I’m just saying that this ‘line rental’ fee or equivalent is paid by companies instead of the individual, based on consumer choice and that companies willingness to pay 1/2pic.twitter.com/zdc39U8vkp
End of conversation
-
-
-
I never said there wasn’t a government involved in regulations/contracts?
I was just making a case for less government and taxes paid to them. Instead it being ‘taxes’ in the form of consumer choice and open/honest advertising driving that choice. -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
I don’t trust companies
the advertising would need to be heavily regulated and probably done by a 3rd party, like a news company full of academics. One that is also heavily monitored for lobbying and ‘funding’ irregularities. Marketing and phsyops are damaging our society. -
This Tweet is unavailable
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.