Same goes for lawyers who reframe client's "views" as actual facts. They cannot be debated. Avoid family law court at all costs. Our legal system is not well.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
In general don't debate people who prioritize YOUR views and YOUR opinion. They're looking to recruit members to their ideological gang. Better to talk with people prioritizing THEIR OWN understanding - people genuinely trying to learn.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But this is an adequate response whenever an opinion or a subjective interpretation of a fact is presented as an unarguable fact that should automatically win the argument.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
True. If we can't debate them, what do we do with them??
-
Don’t hire them. Don’t marry them. Don’t listen to them. Don’t respect them. Don’t lend to them. Don’t borrow from them. Don’t befriend them. Don’t let them in your life. Don’t.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Logic and Reason are what make society possible. Without them, there is no agreement, therefore no collaboration. If "personal truth" is real, human civilization as we know it cannot exist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Big bang, germ theory of disease, evolution by natural selection, plate tectonics, gravity, quantum mechanics... - all just my views; something I decide to believe in based on deciding what feels good & going with it...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Quick on the draw.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Part of the issue is that many people project complex problems as binary is problems. Science isn't binary So often in these “debates” neither side is wrong, they’re just ignoring half the information.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“never engage in debate with those who lack critical thinking skills” -great modern philosopher

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
If so you said, why is this fact so inclined not to be acknowledged and recognised on the daily basis. Isn’t that there is a whim for reality to remain delusional. Red pill cannot advertise “bad is good”. What do you think about synchronicity as sheer fair constraint on souls ?
-
I tried three times, can anyone decipher this tweet?
-
Dialogue without acknowledging facts from both sides is biased and a waste of time. Talking requires listening.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
You exactly confirm the first argument. You didn't do the second argument. You confirmed the third argument. You did the fourth argument. Maybe
@StefanMolyneux is right...
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.