Race is no longer a factor in kidney transplants, the disparity has been closed. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/racial-gap-in-kidney-transplants-combated-by-policy-changes/ …https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1072101117796831235 …
-
-
If the body begins to reject the kidney, simply ban it from twitter. That should stop it.
-
Actually immunosuppressant drugs do that.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Because they are at war with the truth. Note how many people are playing word games now and claiming that Stefan is wrong and they are correct because "Ethnicity" is not "Race" and the two are in no way related at all...
-
It takes about 5 minutes to google the articles they all are reading from. It's all a matter of grammar and precision but they are acting like race in no way exists biologically and in no way is related to ethnicity just to put themselves in a position to call other people racist
End of conversation
-
-
-
Pretending genetics is a non-factor in compatible organ donation lowers your chances of finding a good match, yeah. Genetic variation among ethnicities =/= a validation of the race model.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Rather than categories of distinct races, like the squares in a waffle, we exist in a tangled, amorphous genetic spectrum with no real ends and no real beginnings, kinda like noodles in spaghetti.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Ethnicity is not the same as race. Race is the social construct. Race is superficial grouping of ethnicities.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I see race and ethnicity as two different things. Humans are all the same race. But we vary in our languages, customs, and social structures. That is ethnicity.
-
Don't forget that certain humans adapted to weather (Eskimos or africans) I think that plays a certain role
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Canada is about the sign the UN Global Migration Pact. This is why he's suddenly tweeting about it so much, and why he's directly challenging public figures in ways he wouldn't have in the past. If there was ever a time to have a serious public discussion on race & IQ, it's now
End of conversation
-
-
-
Scientific American is now neither.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
This is true. If this was your point in the original tweet, your construction was clumsy. Of course ethnicity plays a role in organs being a match. It seemed as if you had the professor declining an organ that matched.
-
Or, the professor was smart enough to know the percentage of sustainable use of said organ is lower the further away from his genetics you inherently go. Oil type may be the same for the engine and the oil filter. But, the closer to O.E. you get. The better, inherently...
-
in the original tweet the professor rejected the organ outright on the basis of race with no further questions, while the reply that makes sense would have been something like "so what? Is it a genetic match or not?"
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
yeah i never had a problem with the idea that racial "group" matters here. My issue was that it is an unrealistic and silly thing for the fictional professor to say.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.