Not interested in debating it. Here's why: @StefanMolyneux is not stupid, but his stated position is. That suggests his purpose is not an analytical one.
The logic is straightforward. His position is nuts. But he might well advance his agenda, and I want no part of that.https://twitter.com/Lauren_Southern/status/1070357901057843200 …
-
-
I’ve enjoyed a lot of the IDW thus far. But this event is really showing some of their true colors. I’ve always wanted a Stefan IDW collaboration, but a this more interesting. I like where this is going.
-
Stefan has crossed the line of acceptable topics A true IDW would be bursting at any controversial door. Brett and others (I do like) cuck when they know it suits them and throw fellow intellectuals under the bus. Its sad and based on 'crocodile will eat him first' tactics
-
Absolutely agree.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The idw is an attempt to cauterize the msm’s wound. Aka the rise of alt media individuals like you. They adopted a few and give them the attention they crave, make people believe they’ve found the bottom of rabbit hole and anything further is just nazism reincarnated. It’s smart.
-
This is exactly what I thought when I read the NYT profiles.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
How can any academic biologist who accepts Darwinian evolution (they all do) not also be honest about how human biodiversity is influenced by this theory. It is because it clashes w their liberal religion.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I believe the arguments have been crossed. Bret argued, correctly, about a point that Stefan “maybe” wasn’t making.
-
Say more
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Anyone could have made that error. I don’t think Stefan’s tweet was written very well. I believe it was an honest mistake.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
You're assuming a few things though.. Infallibility just because you're smart. Twitter is the optimum format for such discussion. You need a "left or right" lens to predetermine what words mean I'll respectfully disagree. I'll be charitable to
@BretWeinstein here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Stefan, aren’t you part of the IDW?
-
Could you please explain to me what IDW is? I do not recognize this abbreviation?
-
Appreciate it. Thank you!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
you know like even broaching on the federal reserve problem.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
He's pretty useless in that interview though. At least he brought him on.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Race and IQ. Brett is too scared to engage with Stef so instead is refusing to debate he called his position as 'nuts'