From 800 BC to 1950 AD, 97% of the world’s scientific advancements occurred in Europe and North America. 98% of the significant figures were male. No white males, no modern world. Fact. I’m grateful. Are you? End the hate. Aspire to admire, whatever the race.
-
-
Replying to @StefanMolyneux @AnnaLoydStrong
I understand what you’re trying to say.. But those who’ve achieved for humanity, skin color had nothing to do with their greatness.. There has NEVER been a time in human history when brilliance has sprung from skin color.. If I’m wrong, tell me when?
8 replies 4 retweets 22 likes -
I agree 100% with that Dave
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
look up some of the early civilisations, colour is irrelevant, many other factors plant the seed for the growth of a civilisation, and colour is not one of them
3 replies 3 retweets 6 likes -
“Colour” is an irrelevant red herring. IQ is the real issue. If skin colour was directly relevant to intelligence, intelligence would vary with tan lines. It’s not.
46 replies 45 retweets 254 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
So you’re including poetry in the category of “scientific advancements”?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.