From 800 BC to 1950 AD, 97% of the world’s scientific advancements occurred in Europe and North America. 98% of the significant figures were male. No white males, no modern world. Fact. I’m grateful. Are you? End the hate. Aspire to admire, whatever the race.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
look up some of the early civilisations, colour is irrelevant, many other factors plant the seed for the growth of a civilisation, and colour is not one of them
“Colour” is an irrelevant red herring. IQ is the real issue. If skin colour was directly relevant to intelligence, intelligence would vary with tan lines. It’s not.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Absolutely – when you control for genetics, differences in outcomes have a lot to do with social policies, particularly economic freedom
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 1 more reply
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
So if what you're claiming is not in fact true, then it would mean tanning salons would be like brain enhancement centers? "Go darker & get deeper"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And what about prior to 800 BC? That argument falls apart the farther back you go which is why you narrowed your timeframe. Africa/Middle East/China were power houses. You can’t discount that.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Ever heard of Egypt?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Conscientiousness and disagreeability being the other two biggest factors determining being useful and not a burden to society.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Intelligence past a certain point is not an evolutionary advantage. So, we can’t say that intelligence differs among such large populations— there would be no genetic basis.
-
IQ researcher, Richard Haier has this conversation with Jordan Petersen where programs to raise cognition is evaluated with no effect and says IQ is highly genetic.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PY4sShDt9to …
-
I’m not saying intelligence isn’t genetic— almost everything is in some way genetic. I’m saying it’s impossible for a large population to have a statistically significant difference in average IQ from another large group. That’s the nature of the IQ test
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Read that again, but slowly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.