It’s interesting to me how many people in academia that talk about things being “systemic” are just social scientists and not real scientists. And how many of them are Bolsheviks operating under the assumption that equality of outcome is a goal for all people. I don’t assume that
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
To look at obvious and clear disparate outcomes and to think that IQ has no relation at all, to treat it as an unimportant distinction seems to me to be a self imposed cognitive dissonance to avoid hurting feelings. And that’s fair. This is troubling stuff.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
In any society I think it’s always worth looking at heretical views and asking why they can’t be discussed. If a system wants so badly to suppress views, what are they afraid of? You also ignore a crucial question. Why do people have racist views? Where do they come from?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
I’ve received the exact same education as you and everyone else about this. It is the ubiquitous and accepted dogma. I don’t come from a family of race realists. Quite the opposite. And I have lots of empathy. So what in my experience brought me to at least entertain these ideas?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
What does that word mean to you? I am an empiricist. I don’t hate groups based on their group. If I hate anyone, it’s individuals. But I accept nature as it is. If some individuals are smarter than others, no one gets upset about it. We accept that individuals are smart or dumb
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
Actually political believes are partially heritable, you might want to check out the literature before making uninformed statements
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.