Stephan you're twisting what TJ is saying. He's saying that it's better to go "I don't know" instead of picking a side when there's no proof for or against either party. Stop it
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Or... You goofy goofy man...
@amazingatheist is actually making a good point by saying take time before jumping the gun... And I'm out here defending him...damn it...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Many replies fall for the magic trick in the quoted statement. "We can't know." Stefan is making the point that this is not the same as innocent until proven guilty. Not even close. Miles and miles away in fact.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
And in breaking news: Stefan Molyneux finds a hidden meaning in
@amazingatheist tweets pleasing the alt right. We’ll have more updates as Stefan makes them up.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are... are you high? Can you even read? Were you yoten down a hallway during development? Is this a joke?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
@amazingatheist appears to be taking that position on faith. - 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
His statement is fine. He’s talking about the objective truth of what occurred 35 years ago. None of us can know that objective truth except the involved parties. “Innocent until proven guilty” is a man-made concept created for benefit of Justice. It has no bearing on reality.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.