We've been here before with Clarence Thomas, I'd have absolutely no problem with Brett Kavanaugh becoming very vengeful and rolling back every single liberal policy they wanna keep. They've overplayed their hand for the last time.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Politics is a dirty game.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If liberals will attack Trump supporters in the public square with impunity, how far-fetched is it to believe that one might lie about a Trump nominee concerning an event that never happened 35 years ago.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I also did my own research online and found not only Blasey Ford’s husband and her children (by her first marriage), but also her new husbands family members, are ALL left wing activists who are anti-Trump, his administration and anything Republican.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s starting to get routine that democrats pull out a sexual allegation against a Republican from 20+ years ago every time they have no chance of winning
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They're just trying to delay confirmation until after the election when they MAY have enough votes in the Senate to kill the nomination.
-
And they won't. They think this dog and pony media show trial against a man will agitate their base to vote for their pathetic victimhood platform.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Leftists should be ostracized from society
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Lindsay Graham has sure changed since no name was put to death
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A credible, corroborated rape allegation backed by a therapists notes and a lie detector test. Are you sure you want to defend this guy?
-
The therapists note actually differs. Which Mrs. Ford claims was a mistake on the therapists part. Either way, the very nature of the allegations are completely unprovable entirely and can safely be ignored by virtue of the convenient timing.
-
The difference was extremely minor and the fault of the therapist, not accuser. Also, she passed a lie detector test. Tell me - would you have this exact same posture if this was a Hillary Clinton nominee? Answer truthfully
-
When we're discussing such weighted matters, it really helps for the accusations to line up, period. When the story changes down the line, reasonable doubt occurs. Also, lie detectors aren't real evidence. They aren't allowed in courts for a reason.
-
Yes, they line up quite well given the therapist’s notes independently corroborate. Almost impossible to be a coincidence. Now - what if this were an HRC nominee? Think you’d be this cautious...

-
It's fun that you claim I'm being a hypocrite when I don't ascribe wholly to one political party or the other. In any case, it's up to her and the FBI (which declined to investigate) to provide merit to the wholly unsubstantiated claims of attempted gang rape.
-
You don’t need to wholly subscribe to a party but if you reject evidence, you’re a hack. She provided TWO discrete forms of evidence - (1) passing a polygraph test and (2) having therapist notes from over five years ago corroborate her story. Are you slow??
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.