Yes it does. Our bleeding heart liberals don't see homeless vets or any American, for that matter, as important as parading on the world stage how good they're being to the invaders.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1) Even if they do, the minor is not left without a guardian or foster home. 2) asylum seekers are not criminals by UN definitions.
-
1) crossing the Rio Grande is not legally seeking asylum. 2) fuck the UN
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
According to the Democrats logic they shouldn't if they are ILLEGAL immigrants but yes they should if they are LEGAL citizens. Democrats slogan: ILLEGAL immigrants BEFORE LEGAL citizens.
#MAGA -
You got it!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How dare you use logic and deprive ppl of their self righteous outrage...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It's called "inhuman" to separate child from mother. If she kills the baby in the womb though, it's called "a right" and "her choice". If the father is forced to pay alimony it's "justice". If the mother depends on the state, it's called "welfare". Go figure.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Migrants desperately fleeing intolerable conditions aren’t criminals. The babies of criminals aren’t kept in cages.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Woosh. Point. Missed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well of course not. They are kept together with the other women and communally raise the most perfect human ever.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
then its cared for by taxpayers' money
-
Tell ya what, my tax dollars can go for the kid. Use yours for the moronic wall.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.