I'm also interested in the implication that replication studies are worth less. When the more novel studies are more likely to be unreplicable it seems to me that replication studies show more scientific discernment rather than less. Interested to hear anyones' thoughts on this
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I spoke too soon! Arghhhhh!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I immediately think of this paper when I see construct-level claims based on a significant regression coefficient using a measure with less-than-perfect reliability: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0152719 … (Sample size is no help here!)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting article. I like the idea of post publication review but wonder how this fits with the existence of journals. Would it mean that editors make the call on publication with no help?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
finally someone has said it sound and clear, good measurement and theory, thank you
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.