And why wouldn't they? Arguing for a mathematical solution to a problem whose essence is cultural/philosophical is much simpler than tackling the real problem head-on. Plus it gives you the opportunity to bury your head in the sand and pretend things are somehow "fixed".
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There’s a lot to disagree with in this reaction to my piece, but kudos to someone for taking the time to have a reaction that is more nuanced than “That simply can’t be!”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unfortunate is the wrong word: “I think Schwab’s right that the whole Wansink story is unfortunate: First he got too much positive publicity, now he’s getting too much negative publicity.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Incredible misreading of the news cycle, and major perpetuation of an important & widespread myth.
@chronicle reported at great length and in great detail on Wansink in March 2017—one year ago. You’ll find almost the entire Wansink narrative here https://www.chronicle.com/article/Spoiled-Science/239529 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.