Right on. Write on. Successful replication must be the gold-standard. Non-replicable reports are merely rumor.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If we had "e-Journal of Tentative Results in Need of Replication", other journals could accept only replicated results, crediting both?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can't wait to read'em!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is excellent, is there a “Super Re-Tweet” option??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As random sampling priors have to be uniform (https://blog.oup.com/2017/06/suspected-fake-results-in-science/ … ) why not provide scientists with objective post prob distributions?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.