@StatModeling @vavreck FWIW, I thought that was really, really good.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@StatModeling "Overwhelming" is in the same bin as a lot, large, significant. No place in objective science _without point of reference_!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@StatModeling reminds: renowned experts can be way off http://andrewgelman.com/2014/09/03/disagree-alan-turing-daniel-kahneman-regarding-strength-statistical-evidence/ … (yesss re the rather strong claims about priming in TFAS)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@StatModeling@SeanTrende Now if you could only convince Al Gore, Michael Mann, et al!#climatechangeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@StatModeling Link to Wagenmakers et al paper seems to give 404?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.