Don’t calculate post-hoc power. You can skip the rest of that phrase.
-
-
-
This really needs to spread more, especially to surgery.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Can I give back my MD and become a statistician please? Seems to be much for relevant for my work.
-
If I could do it all over....I'd have started with a different degree
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I tried to post a reply on the blog but it might not have gone through. Anyhoo here's a paper to stimulate / irritate. I'd be genuinely interested in anyone's view on this. http://www.robertgrantstats.co.uk/papers/false_nonsig_rate.pdf …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
fantastic use of 'only only only only' and 'not not not not'.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
How grounded does it have to be? I thought it was okay to say "We should have been able to detect an effects of 0.3 or larger (95% power), which is half as large as the effect Someone et al. (2017) reported."
End of conversation
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.