I dont think shock is what you are attempting to derive from absurdity. Absurd things are just amusing, so long as they are close enough to something real to have some reality. But there is a meta element which I wrote of in my other tweets.
-
-
Replying to @StaringMary @BorisBorisxl and
Best to just take a look at his actual podcast, if you are still having trouble understanding, here is the africa introhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTcMiPs6iPg&list=PL3e1orPYt_4YwSmw1vhXbxfm4fHZdlCkP&index=154 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StaringMary @BorisBorisxl and
Of course the people who are asking you to explain are really just making the point that the only real joke here is "Chinese people look funny". If you don't believe that then you won't find this "joke" funny.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Chris_Hubris @BorisBorisxl and
That's not the joke, the joke is the absurd caricature and the other things I mentioned. He caricatured 5 different cultures. Including the british.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StaringMary @BorisBorisxl and
The "absurd character" is a well established racist stereotype.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Chris_Hubris @BorisBorisxl and
A caricature. Similar to any caricature.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StaringMary @Chris_Hubris and
Yes but caricatures carry racial and nationalist themes which are loaded with bigotry and xenophobia.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @BorrowUsernames @Chris_Hubris and
Not necessarily. You are making that insinuation. My point is that you can mock and caricature without sincerely believing someone is inferior to you. But as you said before you believe humour must have criticism in it, which I do not believe. So we disagree on this point.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StaringMary @Chris_Hubris and
Mocking literally means that you think something is inferior. The humor that Crowder is "attempting" is to juxtapose those of different nationalities/races with "normal" people (white americans) through implication.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @BorrowUsernames @StaringMary and
Also you can't shrug off the moral implications of something just by saying "I don't believe that's wrong". It's kinda ironic, because cons like you hate "postmodern moral relativism", when what you're espousing is pretty much just a crappier version of it.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Nationalism is just a focus upon the nation. In the policies you implement. It is not inherently immoral, that is the, in my view, failed argument of the internationalists. Whichever side you personally come down on, you cannot claim I am shrugging it off.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.