Did the research teams go through the complete process of science- conferences, multiple tries at peer review, etc? I can't tell from the article. If not, this coverage is irresponsible, overplaying the narrative of not trusting research, despite cutting out key steps
-
-
-
Basically, should I be taking away "don't trust working papers" which sure, that's fine, or something much more troubling?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
fMRI researchers everywhere in shambles. Flashbacks to the dead salmon fMRI paper commence. Sign-ups for refresher courses in R and Matlab spike.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IMO this just underscores how young real brain science is
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.