I love the way this thread reframes 'not aggressively censoring wrongthink' as "misinformation promoting". There are many awful blooches; this is one of them. https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/972591994659745792 …
-
-
Put another way, she's claiming oppression when she's merely *not being obeyed*.
-
A recommendation engine is a (mis)information promoter.
-
Is a library one? Results have to come out in *some* order. Should every process prioritize 'won't offend ZT'?
-
So no mechanism that sorts available options and floats some to the top can be viewed as a promotion system?
-
Promotion is an agentic act. The pernicious sleight of hand underlying all these tech critiques is (deliberately) confusing 'X does not positively serve my ideology' with 'X serves an enemy ideology'.
-
I think that's an interpretation of an interpretation. It may even be valid. But the question of "how does comparitively benign surfing generate these kinds of recommendation results" is, in itself, also valid.
-
There's an Issue there, yes. I'm confident (based on other threads I don't have to hand) that ZT is a bad actor here and has nothing constructive to add, except as an example of the problem.
-
I probably agree. But I don't think anyone's going to examine it dispassionately at this point. It's far too fraught, and the interrogation of social media is necessarily going to be about some kind of normative view of society.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
But the article makes no such error.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.